May 7, 2026
2 min read
Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAmShake it off: NASA’s Curiosity rover gets its robotic arm stuck inside a rock on Mars
Haters gonna hate, hate, hate, but the Mars rover Curiosity just keeps on groovin’—even if its handlers had to spend several days freeing its drill from a rock
NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover keeps cruisin’ and can’t stop, won’t stop movin’—until its drill got stuck in some rock.
The problem started on April 25. That day was supposed to be Curiosity’s second day of drilling into a 28.6 pound, 1.5 foot-wide, six-inch-thick rock called Atacama. But as the rover attempted to pull out its drill arm, the rock lifted into the Martian air, having gotten lodged onto the sleeve that surrounds the tool’s bit.
Back on Earth, Curiosity’s human controllers first tried to just shake the rock loose, like a parent trying to free a child with its hand stuck in the cookie jar, but that didn’t work. Then they tried vibrating the drill to knock the rock loose and had no luck. Finally, on May 1, they tilted and rotated the drill while spinning the bit and, after a few tries, the rock came loose, breaking into smaller parts as it hit the ground.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Debris from the rock will be analyzed by Curiosity’s chemistry and mineralogy (CheMin) instrument and compared to samples taken at another site, Mineral King, located nearly 525 feet below the rover’s current location.
With the tool free, Curiosity can continue exploring Mars’ Gale Crater, where it has spent the past 14 years, or nine Taylor Swift eras. Currently, the rover’s environmental team back on Earth is using the robot to monitor atmospheric dust on Mars, as well as to study cloud movements and document the activity of short-lived whirlwinds called dust devils.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.