FULL ASK A POL UAP TRANSCRIPT: Rep. Eric Burlison (4-27-2026)
SCENE: Ask a Pol’s Matt Laslo cuts Rep. Eric Burlison off before the cable networks pounce and drag him in front of their cameras at the base of the Capitol’s East Front steps.
Matt Laslo: “Any update?”
Rep. Eric Burlison: “From the people I’m talking to on the inside in this administration, there is a very — the Trump administration is taking this investigation seriously…”
As they enter the House Carriage Entrance — where horses and buggies used to drop lawmakers off at the Capitol — Burlison gets distracted.
Burlison: “Hold on.”
Burlison peeks around the corner to where producers for cable “news” networks are calling for him to address their cameras.
Burlison: “Hold on a second.”
Laslo: “Yeah.”
Burlison: “They’re taking it very seriously. And so they’re really turning over every stone they can.”
Laslo: “Is that FBI?”
Burlison: “Yeah, I mean, they’re on the investigation on the missing people, the FBI is fully involved. But you also have people that are working the issue for — to release all the documents and files.”
Burlison starts heading to cable camera crews.
Laslo: “Are you convinced that…?”
Burlison: “Thank you, Matt.”
Laslo: “Are you convinced, though, that some of these people have been killed, targeted?”
Burlison: “What I don’t — what I want people to know is that there are a lot of these people — and sadly they’re all a loss to this country and to their families — but there isn’t, I mean, just a logical person would look at these and say some of these people that have been lumped in by the press, mostly, there’s not a connection.”
Laslo: “Yeah?”
Burlison: “They’re all sad circumstances, but there’s not a connection. But it is worth looking into General McCasland and his disappearance.”
Laslo: “Yeah? Should you have a hearing to get that out in public?”
Burlison: “We’ll try.”
A Fox “News” producer — one who trained Laslo in public radio two decades ago this month! — is quietly wooing Burlison to their camera crew.
Laslo: “I mean, now that Fox “News” is covering it?”
Burlison: “We’ll try to.”
Fox Producer: “Who?”
Burlison: “We’ll see.”
Burlison’s led out to the gaggle of network reporters.
Fox Producer: “Who?”
Laslo: “That’s right — Fox, Fox. We don’t say “news” anymore…”
Full interview & transcript at Ask a Pol UAP* *on Substack.
by mattlaslo
6 Comments
I agree with Burlinson, most aren’t connected at all. Some could be connected though.
Maybe stop wasting time looking under stones
“Nothing connects these people!”
NASA scientist found dead..
NASA scientist found dead..
NASA scientist found dead..
Propulsion scientist found dead..
Antigravity scientist found dead..
Ex propulsion scientist found dead..
Two were both from huntsville.
…
“Just, cant figure out anything connecting them at all”
“Some” the others are for Obfuscation, is the obscuring of the intended meaning of communication by making the message difficult to understand, usually with confusing and ambiguous language.
I agree with him. The only established fact is that there’s a link of their professions, but – the amount of employees in the federal workforce and contractors is so massive people can draw a broad connection from anyone. If all of them worked in healthcare and accounting, would people still care?
Granted the disappearance of Monica Reza and General McCasland are very mysterious by nature due to complete lack of evidence or motive, is there a general nefarious motive or do people want to believe in conspiracy?
There’s a real tragedy to the families here and people need to respect that even if they don’t trust law enforcement. Unsolved murders and disappearances happen ALL THE TIME and it often never gets solved, or it can take years to solve. Be respectful and patient – don’t make it personal. Just my two cents.
We don’t need stones looked under we need doors beat the fuck down