According to the office of Action Officer Jill Schwartz of the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review, Grusch’s OpEd is pending investigation/review by AARO

by Oneiroi_Coeus

11 Comments

  1. Oneiroi_Coeus on

    SS: Freelance journalist @ OzarksUnbound on X

    “According to the office of Action Officer Jill Schwartz (@JillSchwartzDC?) of the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review, davidgrusch’s #OpEd is pending investigation/review by DoD_AARO.
    I am listing all that I was given by #DOPSR below.”

    In the Jesse Michels Grusch interview. Grusch actually tells people that they’d self identify trying to [sequester his speech](https://youtu.be/kRO5jOa06Qw?t=1086)

  2. SabineRitter on

    Why tf would it be appropriate for AARO to review the oped. According to AARO, AARO knows nothing about UFOs. So how could they possibly evaluate it?

  3. Uthred_Raganarson on

    Interesting if AARO blocks it, how can they then continue to claim that Grusch is talking nonsense?

  4. UAreTheHippopotamus on

    Wait AARO? Why would AARO have the authority to prevent publication of something that has cleared DOPSR?

  5. FlatBlackAndWhite on

    So does information in Grusch’s Op-Ed clash with the public report that’s coming this week? Or is this because he’s trying to clear information that came from the UAPTF era before they rebranded to AARO?

    The NRO were providing satellite assistance to the UAPTF while Grusch was working on the task force, it’s possible that extraordinary UAP imagery was captured, analyzed and shared with the task force at this time.

  6. porcuswinesandwich on

    If the op-ed refers to meetings with AARO, they might be required to verify. It still seems backwards.

  7. I mean, if you needed anymore indication that there’s some underhanded fuckery going on behind the scenes in an attempt to suppress David Grusch, here it is.

  8. It could be with AARO if he mentioned he tried to reach out to them several times and they wouldn’t respond in the Op Ed.

Leave A Reply