Here's why this is happening.
In previous posts, I've cited ample historical evidence that people have repeatedly seen and described this planet. I've shown how anomalous climate shifts produce a 3,600-year period, and even conducted a simulation proving this is possible without destroying the solar system.

Well, I had a problem with the orbit; I was rotating it in all directions trying to fit the Planet Nine hypothesis, which was largely speculative. So I had to dig deeper and found the only correct and scientifically sound solution for my hypothesis, consistent with the basic Planet Nine hypothesis, which can be understood even by non-astronomers.

In simple terms, the orbits of trans-Neptunian objects are anomalously elongated around Nibiru's elongated orbit, becoming similar to this. Because of this, the direction of the outermost points of these orbits roughly coincides with Nibiru's orbit.

In Batygin-Brown's Planet Nine hypothesis, it's the opposite. The outermost points of the orbits of trans-Neptunian objects and Planet Nine are on opposite sides, and there are certain orbital inclinations that must match for this hypothesis to work.

However, as the simulation showed, for Nibiru to avoid being ejected from the solar system by the giant planets for a long time, its orbit must be retrograde, that is, rotating opposite to the other planets. Then, the high counter-velocity greatly reduces the time of gravitational interaction.

Mathematically, the retrograde motion of an elongated orbit with a 180-degree rotation of the outermost point preserves all of Batygin-Brown's angular elements for Planet Nine, and the hypothesis continues to work exactly the same.

This provides a fairly narrow window of possible orbital orientation, and the historical observations on which my hypothesis is based narrow it even further. In short, this is the region of the constellation Sagittarius, opposite Taurus for Planet Nine.

I projected this orbit onto the sky to look for anomalies or objects of uncertain nature in the scientific data where it should be, and found that it almost coincides with the source of the "Wow!" signal that scientists have been talking about.

In the figure, the white line is not Nibiru's orbit, but its projection onto the sky as we see it. Most of the time, it appears to us in one spot, indicated by the red dot. This location was chosen based on the latest data for extreme trans-Neptunian objects and is consistent with the Planet Nine hypothesis.

The source of the Wow! signal is located 30 degrees almost on this line. Ideally, both points should coincide, but this is within the margin of error and the lack of data on trans-Neptunian objects; adjusting it by 30 degrees makes no fundamental difference.

Thus, the "Wow!" signal, the leading candidate for a technosignature, is also a candidate for Nibiru.

Here's the updated article:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18509944

by pavlokandyba

Comments are closed.