The problem isn't a lack of evidence it is the terminology you are using. Mainstream science labels these massive structures as hexagonal basalt columns or volcanic plateaus, yet it fails to explain the biological geometry within them. Research Devils Tower in Wyoming or Giant’s Causeway in Ireland, and compare their microscopic fiber patterns to the cellular structure of common wood. You will realize we are living on the remains of a giant biological system, classified as dead rock to hide the true scale of the past. The evidence is right before your eyes, but you are searching in the wrong dictionary.
by Professional-Fee3323
10 Comments
wtf is this stupid shit
Science: The Evidence Forbidden Geology Ignores.
Fixed it for you.
So your saying that’s the remains of a giant tree?
No explanation provided for how petrified wood becomes indistinguishable from igneous rock.
So who chopped the tree down and why isn’t there a giant trunk lying about somewhere? I used to think it could have been part of some ancient tree. But you have to look at it critically. You also need to ask why people who study these things and get a degree in the topic disagree with you.
For crying out loud
Maybe go see the doctor, ask if they can put some folds in your brain 🧠 instead of that racing slick you’re working with
So you’re saying that Attack on Titan was actually a documentary?
THIS IS COLUMNAR JOINTING FROM IGNEOUS INTRUSIVE PORPHYRY. Stop posting this bs I know this isn’t your first time.
What is even biological geometry?