The deeper I go down the space rabbit hole, the more things start to feel… off.

Everyone’s hyping Artemis II like it’s going to be this groundbreaking moment for the Artemis program.

But when you actually step back and look at the bigger picture, some basic things don’t line up.

We’re told there are thousands of satellites orbiting Earth, yet:

Try finding clear, undeniable real photos of satellites in space—most of what comes up looks like CGI or renders

Look at Earth images from NASA or the International Space Station—you almost never see satellites around the planet

With today’s tech, where are the constant raw, unedited live feeds?

Now add this:

Look at past reentry footage from spacecraft (capsules coming back through the atmosphere).

You’re telling me we can send people to space…

But the footage looks like it was recorded on a potato camera?

Grainy, low quality, cutting in and out

And then there’s always that “blackout period” during reentry.

We’re told there’s a communication blackout for several minutes due to plasma interference.

But think about it:

With modern technology, satellites, and global coverage…

Is a full blackout really still unavoidable?

Or is it just accepted without question?

And when you do see some of the footage, it honestly looks overproduced—like something straight out of a movie rather than raw documentation.

Then you look at astronaut interviews in general:

Very controlled responses

Nothing truly unexpected or detailed

No mention of anything that challenges the narrative

For something as insane as going to space, everything feels… filtered.

So putting it all together:

No clear everyday visuals of satellites

Earth photos that don’t show what’s supposedly surrounding it

Questionable quality on critical footage like reentry

Built-in “blackout” moments where nothing is seen

Highly controlled messaging

At what point do you start asking if we’re only being shown a curated version of reality?

I’m not saying I have the answer.

But I am saying this doesn’t fully add up.

👉 Can someone with real aerospace or physics knowledge explain ALL of this?

👉 Are there actual raw, unedited sources that prove otherwise?

👉 Or is this just something people don’t question enough?

by ExpensiveDimension6

Share.

10 Comments

  1. You know, those images showing the satellites are not to scale. They are not 600 kms wide…

  2. Financial-Reward9769 on

    The second photo has the satellites as if they were a few miles across.

  3. junk-toaster on

    none of this requires high strangeness to explain. Regarding the visibility of satellites, orbit is just that big that you’re not going to be seeing anything unless you’re trying really hard. You can literally see some of the very large satellites (like the ISS) with a decent telescope in your backyard. By all means, question everything, but also do the research and learn the science.

  4. slipknot_official on

    I mean if they’re faking footage, why make it low and grainy? Makes no sense. You’re saying the fake filtered footage/pictures looks good, while the real footage looks bad. Yeah, that’s not abnormal for anything.

    It’s like asking with all the cellular communications in earth, why do a lot of calls sound like shit. I mean, we have quantum tech and fiber optic communications, why does my phone sound like crap sometimes?

    And as far as satellites go, the earth isn’t the size of a bouncy ball on your phone screen. It’s very big, and satellites are much much smaller in comparison. So looking at a simple generated picture does not represent the actual size of the earth compared to the satellites.

    In short, there’s alot of space in space.

    I also feel most those question can be answered pretty easily since we’ve been doing this space thing for like 70 years now.