It’s the same interview, just without ads or tracking. It has better, clearer interview page layout. It has a bigger header picture, another picture of a Australopithecus skull, a blurb about The Conversation’s mission, and a small blurb about the interviewee.
Phys.org is a content aggregator. They assemble free-as-in-beer (like this) and licensed content and republish it with their own ads and tracking. Usually the original article is a better browsing experience.
2 Comments
The links to human evolution are indirect, unlike what this headline wants to bait you into thinking.
I also had a glance over the actual paper study for this, and it’s less than convincing as a piece of literature. Speculative, at best.
[Here’s the original article](https://theconversation.com/supernova-theory-links-an-exploding-star-to-global-cooling-and-human-evolution-263748), from the Conversation. It’s an interview with one of the scientists.
It’s the same interview, just without ads or tracking. It has better, clearer interview page layout. It has a bigger header picture, another picture of a Australopithecus skull, a blurb about The Conversation’s mission, and a small blurb about the interviewee.
Phys.org is a content aggregator. They assemble free-as-in-beer (like this) and licensed content and republish it with their own ads and tracking. Usually the original article is a better browsing experience.