Seriously asking here. How can one guy that has received $185,000 from Lockheed Martin, and others, that are directly related to the Schumer Rounds Amendment be allowed to cast a vote to continue to hide UAP material from congress?
Is this not seen as buying peoples loyalty for when things like this happen?
It just seems extremely unethical to me for this to be allowed.
Anyone that has received any form of payment, should not be allowed to vote on an amendment that directly effects the organization that paid them off.
Reason I bring this up, is that the next Schumer Rounds is right around the corner.
by jforrest1980
1 Comment
Because he is a congressman and that is how it works. Congress votes on bills.