Ross Coulthart calls out Neil deGrasse Tyson for his hypocritical and unscientific behavior regarding UAPs. He claims Tyson has spent years ridiculing and mocking witnesses, playing a key role in the stigma around the topic. Coulthart says Tyson should be ashamed for ignoring the growing weight of evidence.

The evidence includes firsthand accounts from people with direct knowledge of a legacy retrieval and reverse engineering program. Coulthart argues that Tyson, as a leading figure in establishment science, has unwittingly helped cover up the truth.



by Superflyin

Share.

28 Comments

  1. No_Use__For_A_Name on

    Can we note your past comments as well Ross? Because there’s sure been a lot that you’ve teased us with but never spilled the beans on.

  2. There is nothing inconsistent about what NDT has said. This is all just cope lol. These people have a product to sell and they are piggybacking on NDTs book.

  3. Beneficial_School724 on

    Ross lost all his credibility over the years. He’s just an entertainer now trying to click bait people in the community. Sad ending

  4. _stranger357 on

    This sub is so astroturfed people are going to attack Ross Coulthart more than the guy who’s been ridiculing UFOs his entire career. Somehow Ross is bad because they don’t like the investigative evidence he’s presented but NDT is just a misunderstood guy as someone who’s never even looked at the evidence and just bullies anyone who takes the subject seriously.

  5. TheWesternMythos on

    If your impulse is to dunk on NDT instead of using him great example to others that it’s OK to reassess ones thinking. IMO you are behaving similarly to some of his worse impulses .

    Not accusing anyone specific of doing this, just making a general comment to the wind.

  6. xDantexAlighierix on

    Changing your viewpoint when given new information is not hypocritical. That’s just science.

    Fuck off, Ross.

  7. I’m still of the same opinion: 

    Show actual machines or NHI and there is no more argument. 

    I’m done with “first hand” statements.

  8. >The evidence includes firsthand accounts from people with direct knowledge of a legacy retrieval and reverse engineering program. Coulthart argues that Tyson, as a leading figure in establishment science, has unwittingly helped cover up the truth.

    Everything Iv seen from Tyson is him calling for actual evidence that can be examined, not hearsay from other people. I don’t see anything wrong with that position. So far, neither Ross or anyone else has provided that type of evidence.

  9. craig_hardwick on

    I watched 30 seconds of this video in mute and can tell Ross is full of shit.

  10. Diligent_Peach7574 on

    If your focus is on being angry at others for what they thought, or what they now think about the topic, then you likely are not very sure in your own beliefs.

    Show me the alien.

  11. reader4567890 on

    Coulthart is a cancer to disclosure, and everything he says she be roundly ignored.

  12. HingedUntard on

    Silly science guys not believing in a phenomenon with no credible proof of ever existing, smh

  13. Hah. Wanting better evidence **is** scientific.

    Unlike Garry Nolan who is actually has the most unscientific approach when it comes to this topic.

    Someone saw a ‘star’ thing through a window? Must be alternative visions or whatever the heck Garry called it without a shred of evidence for any of it.

  14. I remember hearing ndr saying some BS about how they couldn’t travel here with light speed Etc. As if he had never even looked into the subject and seen all of the notable people with long careers in highly responsible jobs, acknowledging their existence. I thought to myself, this guy is either an asset, or just saying things to not rock the boat from a career prioritized standpoint.

  15. RustyShackleford_88 on

    “First hand knowledge” that’s all I ever hear…never anything concrete, just hearsay.