A while ago, someone claimed they had the opportunity to work on the remains of an Exo-Biospheric Organism, or EBO. As a chemist and biologist, I became interested not in arguing from belief, but in asking a simpler question: if the biological details that were shared are taken at face value, do they show any internal scientific consistency?

So I started breaking the claims down piece by piece.

In a series of posts, I’ll share visual and written analyses of the alleged EBO from multiple angles, including biometrics and morphology, visual system, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, musculature, excretory system, genome and cellular structure, digestive system, cognition and communication, skeletal system, integumentary system, and absent anatomical structures.

I’m not asking anyone here to accept any of this as fact. I’m also not presenting it as proof. My goal is simply to examine whether the anatomy, physiology, and broader biological design form a coherent system or collapse under scrutiny.

I’ll post the material category by category and let people here draw their own conclusions.

by hhmaizer

Share.

1 Comment

  1. theredmeadow on

    ![gif](giphy|xT5LMUnO4g3yiRNuNy)
    Remind me of this guy. But serious, it actually looks like it could be aquatic.