The way debunks are flying these days I would rather believe its 3 seagulls stitched together
The_Dr_Zoidberg on
Welp, seems legit tbh
AdEarly5710 on
The “yaw rotation” only matches rotation from the filming drone, as if its a bloom or glare – not an actual rotation like you claim
illuminatiisnowhere on
Seems plausible. Nice analysis.
bobsacamano04 on
Best explanation yet honestly
0rdn on
What about the eyes?
I_am___The_Botman on
Drones like this don’t fly, and certainly can’t hover at the angle filmed in this video. Jeez people are really reaching with this one.
FromDeletion on
It was one of ours (human made) as you can see the exhaust plume. Their propulsion systems never emit exhaust.
Commercial_Poem_9214 on
So it’s flying on it’s side?!?
Achylife on
They don’t fly vertical like that though.
Super-Plus09 on
I hate Bots and AI !!!
“Your comment was auto removed for being too short.”
Hey Bot… is this message long enough for you?
Fenki92 on
No.
Careful-Voice8121 on
The perspective is all wrong for this to even be considered, its star shaped and circular. A drone would appear more elliptical. Besides, go the original, look at all the grey cloud moving behind the star, that looks like propulsion of some sort, doesn’t it?
If it was a drone, they wouldn’t have posted it like they did.
If anyone from any country can identify a drone, it’s in Ukraine.
Nonamenofacedev on
You generated this in ChatGPT?
PaddyMayonaise on
I’m a big Occam’s razor guy. I don’t ever intend to debunk anything, but with Occam’s razor I’m typically able to find at least one solution that seems probably enough to rule out anything crazy. Normally I can come up with a few.
Nah, nothing with this yet. I don’t think this is that type of drone. It’s too still, and those types of drones don’t hover on their sides and I don’t *think* have a heat signature like that.
I don’t jump to aliens as a conclusion lol, but this one stays in the “unknown” category still
johnsherlockholmes71 on
No, drones live that don’t fly in acro which is the only way it could tilt this far forward. Those drones the do are always 4 arms/motors. One this large is going to have 6-8 motors she it will you with gyro stabilization so it would be impossible for it to flip over 90% on it’s side like that.
steve_nice on
looks like the back of a missile to me
Gokusbastardson on
Whatever it is, I don’t think it’s alien. It was giving off heat wasn’t it? All stories of alien UAP say they don’t give off heat or have heat signatures.
tlmbot on
Almost everything can be labeled with a prosaic explanation if you look hard enough. The 5 observables are what they are for a reason.
NeymarRealMadrid on
The video released by the US last week having a parachute in it made me feel that it is certainly something made by humans .
shadowmage666 on
No there was no sign of propellers
blurfgh on
Stationary? Sideways? Nah.
Freestaytos4life on
Mick west is currently reviewing the migration patterns of a laden swallows to see if the paths match up
Idahoanapest on
It’s very likely an artifact of a the camera mount fixture.
Almost no effort has been put in to debunk this, nor has any common sense been applied to possible, worldly causes for the image.
My gut says it’s something where the camera is mounted to the aircraft–various image processing allows the camera to pan nearly 360°, except for the point where the camera is mounted, wherein it would show some sort of distorted image of the mount.
This entire phenomenon continues to be a schizophrenia simulator and cryptoid-enthusiast playground, rife with charlatan talkshow hosts blathering on and disclosure always just around the corner.
SaltyBawlz on
I saw someone in a different sub point out that, in the video, this UAP rotates exactly in line with how the camera rotates at one point and that has me leaning towards this being some kind of artifact or piece of the camera rather than a UAP.
28 Comments
The way debunks are flying these days I would rather believe its 3 seagulls stitched together
Welp, seems legit tbh
The “yaw rotation” only matches rotation from the filming drone, as if its a bloom or glare – not an actual rotation like you claim
Seems plausible. Nice analysis.
Best explanation yet honestly
What about the eyes?
Drones like this don’t fly, and certainly can’t hover at the angle filmed in this video. Jeez people are really reaching with this one.
It was one of ours (human made) as you can see the exhaust plume. Their propulsion systems never emit exhaust.
So it’s flying on it’s side?!?
They don’t fly vertical like that though.
I hate Bots and AI !!!
“Your comment was auto removed for being too short.”
Hey Bot… is this message long enough for you?
No.
The perspective is all wrong for this to even be considered, its star shaped and circular. A drone would appear more elliptical. Besides, go the original, look at all the grey cloud moving behind the star, that looks like propulsion of some sort, doesn’t it?
ChatGPT infograph.
Looks like this as an orb
https://youtu.be/LC97wdQOmfI
If it was a drone, they wouldn’t have posted it like they did.
If anyone from any country can identify a drone, it’s in Ukraine.
You generated this in ChatGPT?
I’m a big Occam’s razor guy. I don’t ever intend to debunk anything, but with Occam’s razor I’m typically able to find at least one solution that seems probably enough to rule out anything crazy. Normally I can come up with a few.
Nah, nothing with this yet. I don’t think this is that type of drone. It’s too still, and those types of drones don’t hover on their sides and I don’t *think* have a heat signature like that.
I don’t jump to aliens as a conclusion lol, but this one stays in the “unknown” category still
No, drones live that don’t fly in acro which is the only way it could tilt this far forward. Those drones the do are always 4 arms/motors. One this large is going to have 6-8 motors she it will you with gyro stabilization so it would be impossible for it to flip over 90% on it’s side like that.
looks like the back of a missile to me
Whatever it is, I don’t think it’s alien. It was giving off heat wasn’t it? All stories of alien UAP say they don’t give off heat or have heat signatures.
Almost everything can be labeled with a prosaic explanation if you look hard enough. The 5 observables are what they are for a reason.
The video released by the US last week having a parachute in it made me feel that it is certainly something made by humans .
No there was no sign of propellers
Stationary? Sideways? Nah.
Mick west is currently reviewing the migration patterns of a laden swallows to see if the paths match up
It’s very likely an artifact of a the camera mount fixture.
Almost no effort has been put in to debunk this, nor has any common sense been applied to possible, worldly causes for the image.
My gut says it’s something where the camera is mounted to the aircraft–various image processing allows the camera to pan nearly 360°, except for the point where the camera is mounted, wherein it would show some sort of distorted image of the mount.
This entire phenomenon continues to be a schizophrenia simulator and cryptoid-enthusiast playground, rife with charlatan talkshow hosts blathering on and disclosure always just around the corner.
I saw someone in a different sub point out that, in the video, this UAP rotates exactly in line with how the camera rotates at one point and that has me leaning towards this being some kind of artifact or piece of the camera rather than a UAP.