We probably all remember the NASA panel of 16 and especially its former head Bill Nelson as showing contempt for questions, with a smug dismissal of the topic during their UAP panel.

However, we now know understand that they were fully aware of and had classified UAP activity and interactions around their missions. As shown in the DOW release, with confidential astronaut debriefs and anomalies in the moon photos.

While the panels conclusion focused on "no proof of extra terrestrial" as a lawyer like evading of truth on further examination is NASA guilty of lying to the public? Misleading the public? Or was the panels handling correct?

I believe this is worthy of discussion

Edit: typo

by -Stakka

Share.

9 Comments

  1. Kat-from-Elsweyr on

    I don’t think so they said they’re aware of UAP but couldn’t determine the source of the phenomena, at least that was the impression I got from them.

  2. Submission statement:

    We probably all remember the NASA panel of 16 and especially its former head Bill Nelson as showing contempt for questions, with a smug dismissal of the topic during their UAP panel.

    However, we now know understand that they were fully aware of and had classified UAP activity and interactions around their missions. As shown in the DOW release, with confidential astronaut debriefs and anomalies in the moon photos.

    While the panels conclusion focused on ‘no proof extra terrestrial’ as a lawyer like evading of truth but on further examination is NASA guilty of lying to the public? Misleading the public? Or was the panels handling correct?

    This topic is worthy of discussion because it touches on government transparency, public trust, and how official bodies like NASA handle unexplained phenomena. If NASA downplayed or withheld information about UAPs near their missions while publicly dismissing the topic, it raises serious ethical questions. Examining this gap between private awareness and public statements helps citizens understand whether they are being protected or misled.

  3. NASA has said they’ve **found no credible evidence that Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) are extraterrestrial in nature**

    So unless you’ve found some actual concrete evidence for it in whatever was released (or in anything else), then no.. they didn’t lie.

    Just because someone thinks they saw something, doesn’t mean it was actually aliens, extraterrestrials, NHI or whatever the current word is.

  4. PaddyMayonaise on

    NASA didn’t necessarily mislead, they just were honest.

    Nelson basically said “yea, we’ve seen things, but we have no reason to believe they’re alien”