A few days ago, I shared a detailed breakdown of something I’ve been researching for years. It was about the physics of the "old world" – high atmospheric pressure, giant flora, hyperbaric oxygen trapped in ancient amber, and the hydrostatic support system that allowed mega-fauna (and possibly mega-humans) to exist without collapsing under their own weight.

The response was… predictable, but also disturbing.

· Some called it "AI-generated" (even though I spent months on the data).

· Some mocked it (that’s fine, I expected that).

· But then came the warning. A direct message, telling me to "be careful with canopy theories."

· And yesterday, my post was removed. No violation cited. Just… gone.

Someone from the community messaged me. They said: "Create a group for the truly open-minded. Away from the party of the enemies of success."

I think they’re right.

I’m not here to convince the masses. The masses are asleep, and the gatekeepers are paid to keep them that way. I’m here to find the ones who feel it in their bones – that the sky was different, that gravity was kinder, and that we are living in the ruins of a lost physics.

If you have ever:

· Wondered why every ancient culture speaks of giants and long lifespans,

· Read about the 32% oxygen in amber bubbles and felt your heart race,

· Questioned the Square-Cube Law as a complete explanation,

· Or simply sensed that the "Water Canopy" wasn't a myth but a forgotten mechanism…

Then you are my target audience.

I am starting a private, low-profile space. No trolls. No bots. No "AI-generated" accusations. Just raw data, old texts, forbidden physics, and open minds.

If you want in, comment below with the word: "CANOPY" – and I will reach out.

This is not a cult. This is not a revolution. This is a quiet ark for the ones who remember.

The canopy fell once. It doesn't mean it can't be understood again.

— A seeker of the old pressure

by Professional-Fee3323

Share.

32 Comments

  1. hatecirclejerks on

    Are you a bot, or someone who fucks around with AI way too much and probably should have seen a therapist years ago?

    Seriously, you seem unwell.

    Talk to a phycologist.

  2. Nice-Grapefruit4312 on

    The gatekeepers are paid to keep people from knowing about old world, physics, and high atmospheric pressure. Do you hear yourself?

  3. Ill-Dependent2976 on

    “Wondered why every ancient culture speaks of giants and long lifespans,”

    They’re just stories. People make up stories. Giants and long lifespans are easy fodder for stories.

    “Read about the 32% oxygen in amber bubbles and felt your heart race,”

    No. Why would my heart race? It means essentially nothing, especially since it was 300 million years before an humans evolved.

    “Questioned the Square-Cube Law as a complete explanation,”

    It’s not an explanation, it’s just math.

    “Or simply sensed that the “Water Canopy” wasn’t a myth but a forgotten mechanism…

    No, since it’s clearly a myth.

    There is no forbidden physics, you have no data, you are not a victim, having an open mind means following the evidence, not making it up.

  4. Veritas_Certum on

    I haven’t seen any evidence that you research anything. You post copy/paste AI slop like this:

    * It is fascinating to see how some react to unconventional research. Instead of debating the physics of atmospheric density or geological anomalies, the response shifts to labels and personal attacks.
    * When a crowd acts like a herd, attacking any thought that challenges their comfort zone, they aren’t defending science they are defending their own inability to wonder.
    * Actually, paleontological data regarding Pterosaurs (flying giants) and atmospheric oxygen trapped in ancient amber supports the idea of a drastically different environment.

    When posting without AI, you write like this:

    * Look in video
    * You free to search
    * what are you want
    * Go out I don’t need people like you
    * I’m comment nice on video and follow💗 I’m thinking make video about Dorothy before

    So it’s very clear the overwhelming majority of what you post was not written by you and is not your research.

  5. Spiceynuggetz on

    “Gravity was kinder” well being larger I’d imagine it would be the opposite…

  6. Not AI generated… meanwhile you use “This is not X it’s YZ” sentences…

    This is rather common of AI sooo just wanting to check, OP. Don’t forget the line by line structure.

    And hey, I’m all for sources and data so I’ll be reviewing your account and reporting back shortly.

    Edit: After further analysis, I’d say your second language is English while your native tongue is Arabic. I don’t feel you’re AI yourself, but you seem to use it to output your thoughts into English and this/similar subs.

  7. I truly wonder what it feels like to exist is some fantastical world not based in reality.

    Maybe I should have done more drugs.

  8. >Wondered why every ancient culture speaks of giants

    They don’t. We’ve *anglicised* and homogenised their belief to be “giants”.

    The *gaia-gentes* of Greek myth were just, quite literally, born-of-Gaia, the children of the primordial goddess of Earth. They weren’t necessarily *big*.

    The *Enta* of Germanic folklore are skilled builders and possibly a metaphor for the Roman Empire, but not ‘giants’ in the traditional sense. Hell, in some Norse sagas, one *Etin* is specifically referred to as a Dwarf.