Ask a Pol asks:
In the new Age of Disclosure documentary, you talk about “eminent domain,” which is included in your UAP Disclosure Act with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Why are military contractors exempt from FOIA [Freedom of Information Act], because they’re so woven into the contemporary Pentagon?
Key Rounds:
“There is a general discussion about the fact that some of the stuff that they have is proprietary in nature, and we turn around and we buy their services,” Sen. Mike Rounds exclusively tells Ask a Pol UAP. “So if they’ve got something that is proprietary in nature, they’re not necessarily just simply going to give it up to the US government. They’re going to expect us to buy it from them.
“We buy their products, but not necessarily the patents that created it in the first place. We’re changing a lot of that right now, by the way.”
But it seems like the Pentagon can hide stuff from Congress by having a contractor handle it?
“That’s been a discussion for some time,” Rounds says. “But no resolution.”
Full interview and transcript at Ask a Pol UAP.
by mattlaslo
1 Comment
Submission statement —
# Any plan for your UAP Disclosure Act this year?
“I’ll talk with other folks and see where they’re at,” Sen. Rounds tells *Ask a Pol*. “What I’d really like to be able to do would be to have a more permanent solution than what we’ve got today to make it clear that, look, as time goes along and more of the issues might be more available for public review, there’ll be a place so that it could be accurately held and accurately displayed in the future.
“I just don’t want to do anything that’s going to impact our ability to keep our really sensitive programs secret — or keep them protected.”