I had a wild 100% blind Remote Viewing hit this week and recorded the whole session. Here are the highlights. Blockchain verification and Full 28 min session linked below.

Here's the full 28 min session:

https://youtu.be/K8nuhKOfKKs?si=jJJFR2dkOkZwqNMn

Here's the blockchain verified post on Social-RV:

https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/5ff333ed-bfec-4126-a4ee-f667c25e0834

Here are instructions for how to use the blockchain to verify that this session was conducted 100% blindly:

https://www.social-rv.com/verify?session=5ff333ed-bfec-4126-a4ee-f667c25e0834

Here's the site's creator discussing the statistical significance of their findings so far:

https://social-rv.com/stats

Here is my full list of over 100 Social-RV sessions with a 65% hit rate:

https://www.social-rv.com/users/CraigSignals?sortKey=self_score&sortDirection=desc&page=1

I'm not going to address the tired old arguments about James Randi or why can't you win the lottery or whatever other misinformed notions people use to hand-wave results like these away. Remote Viewing doesn't work well for everything you can dream of but it shouldn't work at all. And yet it does.

I am told I'm currently in the top 15 out of more than 1700 users on Social-RV.com. I'm currently #2 on ARVCollective.com. If the whole thing is just a mirage of coincidence then individual users shouldn't be able to outperform on two different platforms using two different target pools, right? Also user scores improve over time on these platforms, indicating users are able to improve their performance through practice. Like everything else in this field, that should also be impossible and it's not. The statistical p-value of the more than 7000 sessions conducted at Social-RV currently sits at 0.0056. This is a full order of magnitude beyond the requirement for scientific rejection.

TLDR: researchers should be clamoring over each other to study this and figure out how it works and what it means for all of us.