Share.

13 Comments

  1. It’s all been developed without empirical intent. Nature’s nonlocal correlations violate inequalities producing observable phenomena.

  2. Wrong_Confection1090 on

    Do any of you ever stop and think for a second, “Wait, this seems like really important news….why is the only source reporting it a YouTube channel?”

    Because you might give it some thought.

  3. Feels like the video can’t decide between talking about simple facts, wild scientific theories or bullshit.

    Fits the sub perfectly, now that I think about it.

  4. She doesn’t have a PHD or any training in Physics, material science, quantum physics, particle physics, nothing related to what CERN does.

    She does have a Phd in Population Health and has an impressive CV in health/psychology related fields as well as all of her papers are in those fields.

    [https://unige.academia.edu/AstridStuckelberger/CurriculumVitae](https://unige.academia.edu/AstridStuckelberger/CurriculumVitae)

    Yet she is the main component in a ton of the conspiracy theories (I’ve seen her a lot on this topic) around CERN, wormholes, reality bending…I don’t know what vendetta she has or this is some rabbit hole she fell into but she isn’t an expert to be speaking on anything CERN does.

    Also nature has far more powerful reactions than anything CERN does and we are still here, there are high energy collisions in our atmosphere out performing CERN.

  5. Warm-Calligrapher673 on

    I don’t know what to say about CERN or dimensions but bro has a million dollar voice I tell you this much.