Every U.S. president eventually gets the UFO question
From awkward laughs to carefully chosen words—watch how their answers change depending on who’s asking and when.
Coincidence… or something else?
by 87LucasOliveira
Every U.S. president eventually gets the UFO question
From awkward laughs to carefully chosen words—watch how their answers change depending on who’s asking and when.
Coincidence… or something else?
by 87LucasOliveira
16 Comments
You can’t really derive anything from these clips. Obviously, past presidents aren’t going to just spill beans on anything, especially on comedic talk shows. It’s also worth noting that Obama has a more playful personality, so of course he’s gonna go for a joke on comedic talk shows. Hillary saying “there are so many stories [that they can’t all be made up]” is just an argument ad populum. Beyond that, this is your run of the mill government secrecy, which is going to be present no matter what question you ask the president. Telling the public what they might or might not know is a strategic disadvantage. Thats not to say I approve of the secrecy, but secrecy in this context is not automatic confirmation.
Going back to Truman, not one president has seemed to rule them out. While presidents such as Lyndon Johnson may have less connections to the UFO subject, they ALL have connections. And that’s just what’s in the public eye. Then there’s more private ones like the bushes, who of course seem like gatekeepers, right on to Obama who literally confirmed there were things flying around we don’t understand.
Jimmy Carter and Regan both saw UFOs. Ford pushed for more information on the “swamp gas” Michigan sightings. JFK has numerous connections, and reportedly wanted all information about UFOs a week before his assassination. Eisenhower and Truman may be wrapped in the MJ 12 legacy and it goes deeper than just that (I believe there are both real and fake documents personally). Obviously the Clintons both believe.
Trump and Biden had to deal with the New Jersey drones, Biden was president when we shot down multiple strange objects (I believe at least the Alaskan object was anomalous).
To me, it’s evident that there’s something to the phenomenon just from looking at the intersections between the highest office in the US and UFOs
I think the government would like us to think they know more about aliens than they do. It’s in the presidents best interest to not say anything so if another power found out or something I would assume. However Hillary telling him “it’s uap” is not her dropping some major hint, she was just updating them on what it’s called now because she probably thought it was interesting.
[removed]
These answers are basically admission through denial. If there isn’t anything to hide, there’s no reason why they need to be kept secret. The simple, most logical response would have been, “Yeah, there’s nothing. Sorry.”
So, it’s either one of two things, clear proof and evidence of NHI or an elaborate, decades long cover-up and misdirection campaign to hide our own technology advancements.
You know what’s really interesting…. People are finding ufo adjacent files in the EP files. Names are being dropped. They are searching using psi keywords.
I think they plan a huge Psyop of end times with Bledsoe. ( I think he’s been manipulated) especially when you realize the names involved with him.
The Bush family is specifically connected to the creation of the Legacy programs. I’m certain all modern presidents were read in, though some clearly know more than others.
My best guess as to what presidents are told:
“Yes, sir, there are objects in our air space that we can’t readily explain, nor can we shoot down. Craft, parts of craft, and pilots have been recovered, but their origin has not been clearly identified, and their technology is likely thousands to millions of years ahead of ours. We can’t replicate any of it, nor can our adversaries. But if we come out and tell the world that we don’t know what they are or where they come from, we look weak and vulnerable. Not to mention that world stock markets would crash, world religions would be called into question, likely there would be riots in the streets, and the public would be gripped by fear and demand answers that we just can’t give them. They apparently don’t want to destroy us, so we feel our best move would be to just carry on living like they don’t exist, and to deny any knowledge of their existence and our black projects to the public. But, as it pertains to disclosing this information to the public, you feel what you do is right. We just know that the fallout from that admission would be catastrophic to our way of life and our existence in general.”
“my hand would still be hot from touching the bible”
Undoubtedly Jimmy. undoubtedly.
You have to look at it from their viewpoint. They’ve been trying to reverse engineer these things for decades not because they’re curious but because they want to have these technologies in their quiver of arrows to potentially defeat another human adversary. They tend to think that way because if we were attached by another power in the world we would then have something to counteract it if it was bad, if you assume that 50+ years of research have given us tech we can deploy. The other stuff like free energy, antigravity propulsion well, if it’s that advanced it could be used as weapons and they don’t just want to give that away to anyone. They’re looking at not scuttling the economy by making it useless to sell fossil fuels when a majority of those guys in government are major investors in fossil fuel tech. Then there’s some parts of the country where learning that your most cherished religious believes are probably very wrong at best is something they have to be careful about. Today it might not be so bad, but 40 years ago people would freak out.
You have to take into consideration that disclosing intelligent extra terrestrial life opens up society to an alternative to the the systems in place on earth right now.
For example, this could possibly make way for innovations in energy that make oil (and therefore oil companies) obsolete.
What if they get involved in our politics? Now there’s a new political party in the mix.
I think disclosure is a careful hand. It has the potential of disrupting a lot.
*this is all assuming they’re benevolent and would be helping upgrade life on Earth
You’re assuming that they’re even briefed on the topic.
This is all speculation and we are all suckers for trying to determine truth from body language and questionable testimony.
We need to demand that people like Grusch and Elizondo disclose their claims outside of a Scif. They can’t all be arrested and killed if they all come forward simultaneously.
Nobody seems to be considering the Presidents are aware of unidentified things in the sky but don’t know what they are. This would be a reasonable enough answer if the conspiracy theory about retrieved crafts isn’t based in fact.
Nobody is afraid that people will “freak out over aliens”… what they are afraid of is that people will freak out over what aliens are doing.
* How many abduction stories end, with the person not coming back. (Even when we try our best most humane catch and release programs, some of those animals die. …and our research sometimes involves killing the test subjects)
* How much authority do the nations of the world really have, and by extension citizens… if we share the planet with a culture that dwarfs ours technologically.
Here’s a hypothetical.
There are no aliens. There are no higher dimensional beings. There are just humans, some of whom became very advanced, and have found technology to hollow out and live inside of planets, moons, et cetera in a sort of Eden. BUT, they discovered that evolution never stops AND if you deprive a species of all the selective pressure on it evolution moves in an undesirable direction for that species.
So what’s the answer? A species takes a portion of it’s members, and deprives them of all the comforts of technology, leaving them subject to disease, parasites, natural disasters, toxicity, and an enormous amount of pain and suffering. That way, your advanced species always has a ready stock of ‘control’ and experimental groups for genetic material and trials.
You need to keep this stock of ‘natural humans’ intelligent, and allow them the ability to establish culture … to keep them as close to ‘perfected humans’ as possible… but, you’d have to knock them down a few technological pegs, so they don’t pass a certain threshold of advancement.
You could do that with mass disease, flooding, social manipulation, dark-ages … but you’d preferably not want to allow them to contaminate the biosphere you also rely on. …and what if part of that social manipulation was convincing powerful figures that they could ‘transcend’ their lot in life and become part of the ‘advanced’ human group.
It seems to me that this would be a VERY human thing to do, the way our species competes for resources, picks winners and losers, and stratifies itself. Why wouldn’t humans utterly and totally oppress other humans, to the point that the oppressed aren’t even permitted to become aware of their oppressors? It’s literally one of the first things we do when we invent ‘civilization’, is carve out the haves and have-nots.
IF this was a fact… AND the powerful of the world knew it… they wouldn’t concern themselves with, environment, revolution, economic stability… they’d spend every waking moment trying to find out how to become part of the ‘chosen’ group… and all other human life may seem, small, and less important somehow.
Certainly seems to fit with how some view the world. …and there is no way you could ever allow that secret to be shared, ever.
I’m sure they’re sworn to secrecy, and anything classified would be an act of treason/espionage. Not just religious or national security consequences. To be honest they said more with their calculated answers than most of the big names that lead us on in ufology.