I've been researching the structural similarities between CE5 UFO contact protocols and ceremonial magic, and the patterns are unmistakable. Both are consciousness technologies using identical architecture: altered states, symbolic frameworks, intentional projection, and engagement with responsive phenomena.
This is Part 2 of an essay exploring:
– Why contact experiences follow the same trickster pattern across cultures
– The ethics of invocation when something actually answers
– How creative practice functions as navigation technology
– Why consciousness appears to interface with reality at the quantum level
– What responsible engagement looks like when reality is participatory
Drawing on Jung's psychoid phenomena, Keel's superspectrum, Vallée's control system, Kastrup's analytic idealism, and decades of magical tradition.
Not asking you to believe anything specific, just suggesting the evidence points toward reality being more responsive to consciousness than our models permit.
Part 1 can be found here: https://mazetometanoia.substack.com/p/ce5-chaos-magick-and-the-responsive
Would love to hear from others who've worked with either CE5 or ceremonial practice. What matches your experience? What doesn't?
by Creative_Volume_9535