Close Menu
Dr. Beatriz Villarroel shares that 2 independent data analysts have so far successfully replicated 2 of her findings in her peer reviewed study on UFO transients - "Associations between transients and nuclear testing and well as the deficit of transients in the Earth's shadow"
UFO

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel shares that 2 independent data analysts have so far successfully replicated 2 of her findings in her peer reviewed study on UFO transients – “Associations between transients and nuclear testing and well as the deficit of transients in the Earth’s shadow”


Dr. Beatriz Villarroel shares that 2 independent data analysts have so far successfully replicated 2 of her findings in her peer reviewed study on UFO transients – “Associations between transients and nuclear testing and well as the deficit of transients in the Earth’s shadow”

by TommyShelbyPFB

View 12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. TommyShelbyPFB on

    Nothing but good news so far when it comes to [this study](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-21620-3), which is shaping up to be the most important UFO related study ever. I’m sure scientists worldwide are eager to challenge these findings this so there will be many more replication efforts underway.

    It’s very significant though that the lack of transients in Earth’s shadow is being replicated because it supports the hypothesis that these aligned transients are solar reflections from highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit, before humans had the ability to put anything artificial or aligned in space.

  3. Massive-Efficiency74 on

    Excellent news Dr. Villarroel!!! Thanks for having the courage to ask great questions.

  4. maurymarkowitz on

    As noted in the multiple other posts on the topic, Brian Doherty has zero training in or publications on the topic of data science or statistics. (google him yourself).

    He does not describe the methodology or the data, or provide any number other than p, for which no calculation is provided.

    This is not replication, this is some rando saying “I agree”.

    The other “replication” team won’t even give their names.

  5. Obi1inatree on

    Could someone with more horsepower than me explain what this study is on and its significance? Many blessings to you

  6. UapMike on

    The fact there are people who are not willing to be named as of yet should shame the scientific community at large. For shame.

  8. hihowubduin on

    This is the equivalent of Ron Swanson printing “I can do what I want” on a piece of paper and acting like it means something.

    All hat and no cattle.

  9. 20_thousand_leauges on

    Now we just need the MSM to drop their preconceived biases and actually pick this up.

  10. interstellarboii on

    Hank green is in shambles. He’s going to have to make another video debunking this