Ever since photos of the surface of another celestial body were captured, people have examined the images looking for anomalies, which is not wrong, but if you want to find something, you will.

And this is a problem, because people like this in ufology make a lot of noise for the mainstream, drawing attention to simple pareidolias. Yes, are there interesting photos? Correct, but when you look closely you realize it is simply pareidolia or something from the camera that took the photograph.

Unless there is a clear image of something artificial and not a pareidolia reinforced by digitally enhanced images and other things like that, this is simply nonsense.

And another thing, if the government hides the existence of these structures, for what reason are these photos released with such “anomalies”? Instead of the government censoring them or simply releasing the unedited photo and hoping the entire human population does not notice something strange, would it not be easier to simply not send the image with this structure?

Just a criticism of the obsession of a good part of the ufology community with forcing the discovery of something artificial in images.

by Tira-teima_

3 Comments

  1. I think the people finding these “structures” in NASA images forget that the ESA, Russia, China, Pakistan and others have also surveyed the moon.

  2. Because nature forms these shapes too and the resolution is crap. So, it’s not evidence. Just identifying shapes in the clouds…

  3. Logical_Hospital2769 on

    You’re right. Let’s just not look for any evidence until the government tells us the truth.