I feel like the Hubble Constant should not be called a constant, but beyond that, the issue is the assumption that all “standard candle” supernovas are the same universally, and I somehow feel that’s not the case. If we averaged the two major camps of expansion rates to around 70km/s/Mpsc, then recalculate the data from these “standard candles” we may find ourselves with a graph that may show us something we’re missing.
1 Comment
I feel like the Hubble Constant should not be called a constant, but beyond that, the issue is the assumption that all “standard candle” supernovas are the same universally, and I somehow feel that’s not the case. If we averaged the two major camps of expansion rates to around 70km/s/Mpsc, then recalculate the data from these “standard candles” we may find ourselves with a graph that may show us something we’re missing.
Any thoughts?