"My letter requires MITRE to tell Congress what it knows, what it holds, what it has held, what it has transferred, what it has destroyed or was directed to destroy, and which federal sponsors or classification authorities control any responsive records."
Read more 👇
https://defensescoop.com/2026/05/27/rep-eric-burlison-request-for-uap-records-mitre/
Source: https://x.com/RepEricBurlison/status/2059741543976603962
More conversation:
https://x.com/UAPWatchers/status/2059609924418629823
Rep. Burlison Just Put MITRE on Notice Over UAP Records
This MITRE letter is a very specific move into the contractor layer of the secrecy system, and that is exactly where Congress should have been looking from the very start.
Rep. Eric Burlison is now pressing The MITRE Corporation, a federally funded research and development center, for answers on whether it has ever held, analyzed, transferred, destroyed, withheld, or controlled records tied to UAP, anomalous aerospace or undersea events, recovered materials, technologies of unknown origin, and alleged legacy crash retrieval or reverse engineering programs. Pretty strong wording framed as a records control inquiry aimed at federally funded entities that may have handled government funded data, technical analysis, classified deliverables, sponsor communications, contract records, or program material connected to the UAP Records Collection.
MITRE operates FFRDCs and sits inside the federal research, defense, intelligence, aviation, cybersecurity, and systems engineering ecosystem. These organizations often get privileged access to federal programs, classified information, sensitive data, government facilities, and technical work that never touches the public facing record. Burlison's point is simple, that if public money funded the work, and if Congress created a UAP Records Collection under the FY 2024 NDAA, then these entities can't function as private vaults for federal records.
For years, the UAP debate kept circling around the Pentagon, AARO, NASA, and intelligence agencies. But if the deeper records were ever pushed into contractors, FFRDCs, laboratories, subcontractors, classification offices, and sponsor controlled compartments, then asking agencies alone was never going to be enough. The paper trail may sit in contract deliverables, sensor datasets, historical studies, classification guides, nondisclosure instruments, internal disclosures, materials analysis, third party agreements, or records marked as sponsor controlled. Burlison's interrogatories appear designed to force that layer out into the light.
This also builds directly on his recent pressure campaign toward MIT Lincoln Laboratory over historical UAP related records associated with the Beacon Hill Study and the reel to reel recording identified as 'AF-ATIC-FILM, 03/52.' That earlier request asked MIT Lincoln Laboratory to identify, preserve, digitize, and coordinate transfer of responsive records to the National Archives for inclusion in the UAP Records Collection. MITRE is now being pulled into the same area of accountability.
The strongest part of Burlison's statement is that he doesn't ask MITRE to endorse any conclusion about what UAP are. He asks MITRE to tell Congress what it knows, what it holds, previously held, transferred, destroyed or was directed to destroy, and which federal sponsors or classification authorities control any responsive records. That is how this should be done. Start with custody, records and who had the data, who controlled access, who gave instructions, and whether anything was withheld from lawful declassification channels.
Burlison is explicitly encouraging people with information about contractor held federal records, improper classification, records destruction, retaliation, or concealment to use protected channels, including Inspectors General, the Office of Special Counsel, GAO, the House Whistleblower Ombuds, or congressional offices. That is an open invitation to anyone inside the contractor or FFRDC world who knows where the records are buried to blow the whistle.
Congress is asking whether the federal contractor ecosystem has become the storage layer for records that should have been identified, preserved, reviewed, digitized, and transferred to NARA. If there is a legacy program paper trail, this is one of the places it would be expected to turn up.
Kudos to Burlison, he is putting pressure on the right places.
by TheGoldenLeaper