After years already of "allegedly" real UAP videos, being these latest releases pretty much the same as we saw before since 2-3 years ago maybe ¿?:
When is enough to release something truly unquestionable ?
Of course, this is where the theory of "conditioning" comes in. Preparing the public, or at least, supposedly, that’s what they’re doing.
And I’d agree, were it not for the fact that they’re not actually releasing anything new.
An electoral ploy to drag out something that distracts from the bigger picture ?
-I'm tired boss-
by QueenGorda
2 Comments
Just a ramping up of the same slow drip disclosure campaign started in 2017. I think we’ll get there, they just don’t want to freak people out since there are so many different responses to this information ranging from apathy to downright anger and refusal to even consider this is possible.
People should chill while we can, we haven’t even gotten the bad news yet.
Well we are getting exactly what we asked for.
UAP.
If there was HD colour footage of a flying disk with greys poking their head through the window, then I’m willing to bet it would be categorized as a craft of some kind, and not a UAP.
In this subject I think it’s safe to say that language is very important.
For example:
Media asks:
“Has the us government in some capacity retrieved craft of none human origin in its current capacity and attempted to or are in the process of reverse engineering them?”
Military answer:
“There is no evidence that we have been visited by extra terrestrials.”
Which completely dodges the question but frames it as an actual answer to it. And even though the answer could be true in a sense, it disregards all other hypothesis about what none human could be, such as interdimensional, crazy time travel shit, or whatever…
Fyi this was only an example of question dodging and it’s not an actual quote.
Bottom line is, we are getting exactly what we asked for which is videos and documents about UAP… with some crap thrown in to muddy the water.