Third person connected to Los Alamos National Laboratory vanished from the New Mexico defense corridor with the same signature: personal effects left behind, negative searches, no body.
Third person connected to Los Alamos National Laboratory vanished from the New Mexico defense corridor with the same signature: personal effects left behind, negative searches, no body.
Anthony Chavez, 78, retired LANL employee. Vanished May 2025 from Los Alamos. Wallet, keys, cigarettes on the table. No cell phone. Cadaver dogs negative. Detective: “It was just like he left.” Never found. This is the third NM corridor disappearance with an identical physical signature.
Melissa Casias (LANL, June 2025): both phones factory-reset, seen staggering on surveillance footage carrying a backpack, never found.
William McCasland (former AFRL Commander, February 2026): phone and glasses left, red backpack missing, nobody witnessed his departure, never found.
What’s the baseline chance of someone 70+ disappearing to commit suicide? I know it’s higher than we expect but this seems excessive even for that age range.
Traditional-Camp8720 on
The Melissa Casias detail that doesn’t get enough attention: both phones factory-reset before she vanished. That’s not panic. That’s procedure. Someone knew what they were doing, or she did. Either answer is disturbing. The staggering on surveillance could be a lot of things, but combined with the reset phones and the backpack, it reads like a departure that was prepared for her.
Gooser3000 on
What is the “
New Mexico defense corridor” ?
soupdawg on
Sounds like some folks are going off world.
GroundbreakingUse794 on
They got Sucked up. Too bad
Broad-Abroad5455 on
If its 3 or 4 people of any other group in any other setting found so close together, then investigators would flag this as suspicious and leave it on the table until proven otherwise. They would continue to investigate.
What are we getting from news outlets or investigators in regards to these events? I’m not seeing anything, which doesnt surprise me given the new landscape for reporting the news.
8 Comments
Anthony Chavez, 78, retired LANL employee. Vanished May 2025 from Los Alamos. Wallet, keys, cigarettes on the table. No cell phone. Cadaver dogs negative. Detective: “It was just like he left.” Never found. This is the third NM corridor disappearance with an identical physical signature.
Melissa Casias (LANL, June 2025): both phones factory-reset, seen staggering on surveillance footage carrying a backpack, never found.
William McCasland (former AFRL Commander, February 2026): phone and glasses left, red backpack missing, nobody witnessed his departure, never found.
[All three within a hundred miles of each other. Same empty rooms. Same negative searches. Same result.](https://thesentinel.network/p/the-blind-spot-rocks-are-falling?r=71h4we)
What’s the baseline chance of someone 70+ disappearing to commit suicide? I know it’s higher than we expect but this seems excessive even for that age range.
The Melissa Casias detail that doesn’t get enough attention: both phones factory-reset before she vanished. That’s not panic. That’s procedure. Someone knew what they were doing, or she did. Either answer is disturbing. The staggering on surveillance could be a lot of things, but combined with the reset phones and the backpack, it reads like a departure that was prepared for her.
What is the “
New Mexico defense corridor” ?
Sounds like some folks are going off world.
They got Sucked up. Too bad
If its 3 or 4 people of any other group in any other setting found so close together, then investigators would flag this as suspicious and leave it on the table until proven otherwise. They would continue to investigate.
What are we getting from news outlets or investigators in regards to these events? I’m not seeing anything, which doesnt surprise me given the new landscape for reporting the news.
They were going home, not even human