Chris Mellon sends “Arxiv” a letter after they inexplicably rejected 2 submissions from Dr. Beatriz Villarroel – “Do you really want to continue to shun the UAP issue as compelling new data becomes available, data that has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of science and engineering?”

For those not aware of Dr. Villarroel’s UAP Transient study here’s NBC News breaking it down really well:

[**https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8FY3qUKUyQ**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8FY3qUKUyQ)

“**Arxiv**” is a major preprint repository operated by Cornell University where researchers share scholarly articles prior to journal publication. Dr. Villarroe’s 2 papers already passed peer review by other respected journals, as pointed out on NBC news above. There’s absolutely no reason Arxiv should be rejecting her submissions other than STIGMA.

I’ve also noticed repeated skeptic talking points about “dataset” problems with this study, [here’s Dr. Villarroel’s preprint response](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.15171) explaining why that argument is misleading and relies on incomplete data.