Dr. Beatriz Villarroel explains the nuclear UFO connection in her “transients” study. They found a 68% increase of UFO transients appearing above Earth’s atmosphere a day after a nuclear test. And an additional increase in transients whenever UFO sightings were reported on Earth.
Dr. Beatriz Villarroel explains the nuclear UFO connection in her “transients” study. They found a 68% increase of UFO transients appearing above Earth’s atmosphere a day after a nuclear test. And an additional increase in transients whenever UFO sightings were reported on Earth.
Theory – They show up in plate images above Earth’s atmosphere right after nuclear tests. They show up at the same time UFOs are reported on Earth. It seems they are coming from somewhere outside Earth’s atmosphere to check out what the intelligent apes here are up to with nuclear weapons.
Ok-Strawberry3579 on
Love the 2008 style school project powerpoint.
SecretTraining4082 on
When is Villarroel going to post the full dataset?
Used-Emphasis-6692 on
Imagine your sensors kept detecting stars exploding hundreds in the same sector and spot yea id go see whats up too.
“What do you mean the moneys have found the exploding rocks?!”
Deliteriously on
So if they’re this obvious, then NASA absolutely has to be actively covering up stuff almost daily, right? Or at the very least actively ignoring it. Makes me think that all those livestreams where a ufo comes into frame and they shut it off are all legit.
mop_bucket_bingo on
I don’t think much will come of this because she’s reaching a wild, untestable conclusion.
What is anyone supposed to do with this information?
Matmat1645 on
It’s refreshing to finally, apart from all those whistle blowers and their reports, finally see some sort of evidence, to see actually fact based research with explanations of all the limitations and subsequent academic discussions etc. Only what can be proven can be believed to actually exist. If not, we will forever dwell in the realm of a pseudo- religion of alien believers. More science and research is needed! Whatever it is that is going on, we need to find out more about its nature.
Shardaxx on
Imagine how many UFOs will appear if we have a nuclear war.
whydontyouwork on
They are just rubber necking
Positive-Reason-8913 on
Imagine if they doctored information to look like they were onto something to get people to buy their books and go to their payed seminars. Just imagine. I know this looks like a low effort answer, but after being interested in this topic for over 30 years and this is the only evidence I’ve ever found wouldn’t you think the same way.
ConsiderationThen873 on
Dr. Villarroel’s work with the VASCO project is honestly one of the most grounded pieces of evidence we have right now. Those transients from before 1957—way before Sputnik—are the ultimate ‘smoking gun’ that we’re dealing with something that doesn’t fit the standard physicalist narrative.
The nuclear connection she’s highlighting makes so much sense if you stop thinking about these as ‘aliens in metal ships’ and start thinking about them as a response of the environment itself. I’ve been diving deep into radionics and the idea of ‘Informational Reality’ lately (I actually posted a while back about how ancient Anatolian Muskas might have functioned as passive frequency modulators—wild stuff, but the geometry is there).
What if nuclear fission isn’t just a physical explosion, but something that creates a ‘data-glitch’ in the informational fabric of our local reality?
Maybe these transients aren’t ‘visitors’ traveling from light-years away. They could be automated system responses—like an antivirus or a debugger—reacting to us messing with the ‘Source Code’ (the atomic nucleus). If the universe is informational at its core, high-energy transients appearing around nuclear sites might just be the system trying to ‘patch’ a localized anomaly we created.
Has anyone tried to overlay the exact timestamps of the 1952 transients with the atmospheric nuclear tests of that year? There has to be a correlation there.”
Lost_Towel3759 on
Would love to see if there is a dose dependant reponse relationship between number of transients and Megaton or terajoules output of an atomic explosion. I suspect if such a relationship is obseved then it may lower support for the idea that they are autonomous UAP and maybe a byproduct from the detention in the regions of the sky being observed.
12 Comments
Source: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6NuZxKCh9c](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6NuZxKCh9c)
Theory – They show up in plate images above Earth’s atmosphere right after nuclear tests. They show up at the same time UFOs are reported on Earth. It seems they are coming from somewhere outside Earth’s atmosphere to check out what the intelligent apes here are up to with nuclear weapons.
Love the 2008 style school project powerpoint.
When is Villarroel going to post the full dataset?
Imagine your sensors kept detecting stars exploding hundreds in the same sector and spot yea id go see whats up too.
“What do you mean the moneys have found the exploding rocks?!”
So if they’re this obvious, then NASA absolutely has to be actively covering up stuff almost daily, right? Or at the very least actively ignoring it. Makes me think that all those livestreams where a ufo comes into frame and they shut it off are all legit.
I don’t think much will come of this because she’s reaching a wild, untestable conclusion.
What is anyone supposed to do with this information?
It’s refreshing to finally, apart from all those whistle blowers and their reports, finally see some sort of evidence, to see actually fact based research with explanations of all the limitations and subsequent academic discussions etc. Only what can be proven can be believed to actually exist. If not, we will forever dwell in the realm of a pseudo- religion of alien believers. More science and research is needed! Whatever it is that is going on, we need to find out more about its nature.
Imagine how many UFOs will appear if we have a nuclear war.
They are just rubber necking
Imagine if they doctored information to look like they were onto something to get people to buy their books and go to their payed seminars. Just imagine. I know this looks like a low effort answer, but after being interested in this topic for over 30 years and this is the only evidence I’ve ever found wouldn’t you think the same way.
Dr. Villarroel’s work with the VASCO project is honestly one of the most grounded pieces of evidence we have right now. Those transients from before 1957—way before Sputnik—are the ultimate ‘smoking gun’ that we’re dealing with something that doesn’t fit the standard physicalist narrative.
The nuclear connection she’s highlighting makes so much sense if you stop thinking about these as ‘aliens in metal ships’ and start thinking about them as a response of the environment itself. I’ve been diving deep into radionics and the idea of ‘Informational Reality’ lately (I actually posted a while back about how ancient Anatolian Muskas might have functioned as passive frequency modulators—wild stuff, but the geometry is there).
What if nuclear fission isn’t just a physical explosion, but something that creates a ‘data-glitch’ in the informational fabric of our local reality?
Maybe these transients aren’t ‘visitors’ traveling from light-years away. They could be automated system responses—like an antivirus or a debugger—reacting to us messing with the ‘Source Code’ (the atomic nucleus). If the universe is informational at its core, high-energy transients appearing around nuclear sites might just be the system trying to ‘patch’ a localized anomaly we created.
Has anyone tried to overlay the exact timestamps of the 1952 transients with the atmospheric nuclear tests of that year? There has to be a correlation there.”
Would love to see if there is a dose dependant reponse relationship between number of transients and Megaton or terajoules output of an atomic explosion. I suspect if such a relationship is obseved then it may lower support for the idea that they are autonomous UAP and maybe a byproduct from the detention in the regions of the sky being observed.